This entry will be a hodgepodge, or as they say in some circles, a "hotch potch." (I think it's a Britishism; Colin Wilson used that spelling many times.) Stuff has been piling up in the Contra file. Carol and I have been slighting housework for these past six months, she laid up after surgery on both feet, and me writing what has doubtless been the most difficult half-a-book I've ever written. We've been cleaning up, putting away, and generally getting back to real life. Real life never tasted so delicious.
One reason is rum horchata. I'm not one for hard liquor, mostly, and generally drink wine. (Beer tastes far too bitter to me.) But Rumchata got me in a second. It's a dessert cordial no stronger than wine, with the result that you can actually taste the other ingredients, like vanilla, cream, and cinnamon. Highly recommended.
People ask me periodically what I've been reading. After soaking my behind in computer science for the past six or eight months, I've been studiously avoiding technology books. That said, I do endorse Degunking Windows 7 by my former co-author Joli Ballew. I actually used it to learn some of the Win7 details that weren't obvious from beating my head on the OS. I wish it were a Coriolis book, but alas, it's not. That doesn't mean it's not terrific.
True to my random inborn curiosity about everything except sports and opera, I've developed an interest in the chalk figures of southern England. The next time we get over there (soon, I hope, though probably not until summer 2015) we're going to catch the Long Man of Wilmington, the White Horse of Uffington, and that very well hung (40 feet!) Cerne Giant. Other chalk figures exist, many of them horses. Some can be seen from Google Earth. A reasonable and cheap intro is Lost Gods of Albion by Paul Newman. The book's been remaindered, and you can get a new hardcover for $3. I wouldn't pay full price for it, but it was worth the hour and change it took to read. My primary complaint? It needs more pictures of chalk figures, duhh.
Quick aside: While researching kite aerial photography with my found-in-the-bushes GoPro Hero2 sports camera, I came upon an impressive video of the White Horse of Westbury taken from a double bow kite (rokkaku). I have the cam, and loads of kites. All I need now is a chalk figure. (I suspect I could coerce my nieces into drawing one for me.)
Far more interesting than Lost Gods of Albion was Gogmagog by Thomas Lethbridge. I lucked into a copy of the 1957 hardcover fairly cheap, but availability is spotty and you may have to do some sniffing around. If you're willing to believe him, Lethbridge did an interesting thing back in the 1950s: He took a 19th century report that a chalk giant existed on a hillside in Wandlebury (near Cambridge) and went looking for it. His technique was dogged but straightforward: For months on end, he wandered around the hillside with a half-inch metal bar ground to a point, shoving it into the ground and recording how far it went in before it struck hard chalk. His reasoning was that the outlines of a chalk figure would be dug into the chalk, and thus farther down than undisturbed chalk. In time he had literally tens of thousands of data points, and used them to assemble a startling image of two gods, a goddess, a chariot, and a peculiar horse of the same sort as the Uffington White Horse.
Not everybody was convinced. Even though Lethbridge was a trained archaeologist, his critics claimed that he was a victim of pareidolia, and simply seeing the patterns he wanted to see in his thousands of hillside holes. The real problem was that Lethbridge was a pendulum dowser, and a vocal one: He published several books on the subject, which make a lot of claims that aren't easily corroborated. Lethbridge claims that most people can dowse, and hey, it's an experiment that I could make, if I decided it was worth the time. (It probably isn't.)
The third book in my recent readings is The Physical Phenomena of Mysticism by Herbert Thurston, a Jesuit priest who spent a good part of his life collecting reports of peculiarly Catholic weirdnesses (stigmata, levitation, inedia, odor of sanctity, etc.) and presenting them in a manner similar to that of Charles Fort, if better written. Most of the articles were originally published in obscure theology journals, but were collected in 1952 in a volume that I've never seen for less than $100. Last year it was finally reprinted by White Crow Books and can be had for $18. I'm not sure what one can say about reports of people who have not eaten for forty years. Mysticism is a weird business, but physics is physics. The book is entertaining, and it's given me some ideas for stories, particularly since I have a spiritually butt-kicking psychic little old Polish lady as a major chartacter in Old Catholics. (Vampires are just so 2007.)
If three books doesn't seem like much, consider my habit of going back to books I've read and liked, and flipping through them to see what notations I've made in the margins. We all make them; when was the last time you deliberately went back to read and reconsider them? I've been dipping into Gary Taubes' Good Calories, Bad Calories, Steven Pinker's The Better Angels of Our Nature, Colin Wilson's A Criminal History of Mankind, and Matt Ridley's The Rational Optimist, and arguing with my own marginal notes. One can learn things arguing with oneself, and I've been known to change my mind based on things I scribbled in other people's book's ten or twelve years ago. (Before that I was too young to have anything like informed opinions.)
For example, I've gone back to calling it "global warming." Climate is always changing, and the assumption that we know all the forces propelling those changes is just wrong--and in tribalist hands, willfully dishonest. Carbon dioxide has exactly one climate trick in its bag: It warms the atmosphere. That's it. If the discussion is about carbon dioxide, it's about global warming. Why climate changes is still so poorly understood (and so polluted by political hatred) that we may be decades before we even know what the major forcings are. In the meantime, I want predictions. If your model gives you climate data out fifty years, it will give you data out five. Publish those predictions. And if they prove wrong, be one of those people who really do #*%^*ing love science and admit it. Being wrong is how science works. Being political is how science dies.
I have a long-delayed electronics project back on the bench: Lee Hart's CDP1802 Membership Card. I started it last summer, and set it aside when the Raspberry Pi gig turned up. It's basically a COSMAC Elf in an Altoids tin. I had an Elf almost forty years ago. I programmed it in binary because that's all there was in 1976. And y'know? I can still do it: F8 FF A2. F8 47 A5...
Some things really are eternal.